International Initiative
Freedom for Ocalan Peace in Kurdistan
P.O. Box 100511, D-50445 Koeln
E-Mail: info@freedom-for-ocalan.com
Url: www.freedom-for-ocalan.com
Meeting of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Tuesday 16 March
2004-03-12
Draft Report on Turkey by Arie M. Oostlander
Open Letter to the Members of the Foreign Communittee of the
European Parliament
Cologne, 16 March 2004
Dear Member of the Committee,
Hitherto, neither the European Parliament nor the European Commission
nor the European Council have been able to call the Kurdish question
in Turkey Kurdish question. Instead, also in the new draft report
this issue comes once again only implicitly under the header of
minority issues. We would like to take the opportunity of the imminent
discussion of the draft to comment on some contentious points particularly
in the light of the forthcoming decision in December on the beginning
of accession talks with Turkey.
We are convinced that a change of behaviour on the part of Turkey
in terms of respecting the Kurds as an ethnic and cultural entity
cannot possibly be accomplished as far as our experience goes if
this group is not explicitly mentioned in these documents of the
Union.
The general demand for minority protection compatible with present
EU standards, which has been employed instead in the previous reports,
falls short. At this point Turkey always refers to the Lausanne
Treaty, which does not mention the Kurds as a minority. In other
words, what is required here is the constitutional establishment
of the Kurds as a national minority in Turkey in order to guarantee
them the same rights that other national minorities in the Union
have been enjoying for a long time.
It is not enough at this point to demand a non-minimalist interpretation
of the Lausanne Treaty. Ever since it was signed this treaty has
never been interpreted as relating to the Kurds but only to the
Christian minorities in Turkey. A different interpretation would
in principle amount to a revision of Lausanne concerning the status
of the Kurdish people in Turkey. Turkey has always dismissed this.
We believe it is mandatory, therefore, that the Turkish constitution
be amended accordingly in order to guarantee the rights of the Kurdish
ethnic group while bringing minority rights in Turkey up to the
standards of the Union.
We call on the members of the Committee on Foreign Affairs to include
formulations in their report that both mention the Kurdish people
by name and make it also perfectly clear which constitutional amendments,
therefore, are to be implemented by Turkey.
Note
Art. 38 to 45 of the Lausanne Treaty guarantees the "rights
of the Minorities". Ismet Pascha Inonu, prime minister and
head of the Turkish delegation in Lausanne announced during the
conference on January 23, 1923:
"The government of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey is
the government of the Kurds as well as of the Turks because the
true and legitimate representatives of the Kurds have their seats
in the National Assembly and take part with equal rights like the
representatives of the Turks in the government and administration
of the country."
(French Foreign Ministry, Documents diplomatiques: Conférence
de Lausanne", Paris 1923, pp.283, 284)
|